08-01-2015, 01:34 PM
Spin doctor said;
"Airservices said the new reviews were evidence that both CASA, which sets safety standards, and itself as the service provider were “on top of the situation”.
To that I call bullshit. Sorry it is 'on top of you', not 'you on top of it'. You are now talking about it only because everyone else has highlighted the safety risks for you because you are too useless to do it yourselves. Naughty naughty, pcaught out.
And then the coverup;
"The reviews follow a CASA audit last month Airservices’ operations, which CASA said yesterday was confidential and would not be publicly released".
Of course you don't want to discuss it, and there is two reasons for that;
a) It was a piss weak audit and you have turned the blind eye, or
b) It was thorough audit, there are huge deficiencies and you want it to be buried.
Naturally Sir Anus wants it all kept under lock and key, that's how he operates. But it won't stop the Senators pushing for the details.
Sneaky sneaky
"Airservices said the new reviews were evidence that both CASA, which sets safety standards, and itself as the service provider were “on top of the situation”.
To that I call bullshit. Sorry it is 'on top of you', not 'you on top of it'. You are now talking about it only because everyone else has highlighted the safety risks for you because you are too useless to do it yourselves. Naughty naughty, pcaught out.
And then the coverup;
"The reviews follow a CASA audit last month Airservices’ operations, which CASA said yesterday was confidential and would not be publicly released".
Of course you don't want to discuss it, and there is two reasons for that;
a) It was a piss weak audit and you have turned the blind eye, or
b) It was thorough audit, there are huge deficiencies and you want it to be buried.
Naturally Sir Anus wants it all kept under lock and key, that's how he operates. But it won't stop the Senators pushing for the details.
Sneaky sneaky