I agree Sandy.
It fail to understand how this event is in any way different from the Mildura incident.
Both were weather related, not fuel related, nor related to deficiencies in crew management
of the flights.
In both incidents the flights departed legally with all statutory requirements complied with.
In both incidents the crews found themselves in a fuel critical situation because the weather deteriorated while en-route. In both cases the crews were not made aware of the peril they were flying into until their available options had been passed.
Chambers actions against Dom James, as discovered by Peetwo joining the dots in my opinion smacks of malfeasance.
It fail to understand how this event is in any way different from the Mildura incident.
Both were weather related, not fuel related, nor related to deficiencies in crew management
of the flights.
In both incidents the flights departed legally with all statutory requirements complied with.
In both incidents the crews found themselves in a fuel critical situation because the weather deteriorated while en-route. In both cases the crews were not made aware of the peril they were flying into until their available options had been passed.
Chambers actions against Dom James, as discovered by Peetwo joining the dots in my opinion smacks of malfeasance.