[P7_TOM]

In the interests of investigative probity.

Just read the Paul Howard modest offering on Paper-Li – HERE – It's not dripping with 'conjecture' or high blown theory; just a workman like series, a practical mans approaches to solving the early riddles.  It raises the sort of questions a logical person would ask; simply to eliminate dead ends, false starts and widely spaced breadcrumbs.  The answers may not be correct, which is fine – provided they can be discounted after 'expert' assessment, based on known facts; but, as it stands, he makes just as much good sense as any and a damn site more than many others.  

In the interests of investigative probity, can Be-a-Cur confirm that the calculations are proven flawed and have been discounted after examination; or are they just another tendentious, waste of time line of inquiry which has been summarily dismissed, by qualified experts, such as himself?.  Don't hold your breath, we use the beyond all reason method and talk to Unicorns.  Perhaps he could read some Howard and enjoy some logical, professional food for thought, as a how to lesson and see what 'investigating' means.  

....This is vitally important in determining what was seen. NOTHING was seen in real time. ALL radar is from recordings and NOT anecdotal from individual operators. Recordings are able to be very specific about one thing, POSITION and that is exactly what’s missing from the Interim Report. Why?

.....I’ve transferred that information on to my own plot as best I can and remember my comment earlier, the one definitive piece of information which can be derived from a radar recording is position and that is exactly the information which is missing.