For example.
The Airservices recording – Part 3 – from the four second mark; provides a good example of the story line Halfwit is trying so desperately to maintain. He wants to keep the narrative restricted to the narrow ‘terms of reference’ the ANAO were restrained by. The Senators are armed with additional knowledge and they let him know that; on several occasions, yet blindly Halfwit follows the script, as writ. Once Sterle gets into the nitty-gritty Halfwit is up on his hinds legs, barking at the front gate, chained to a lack of imagination, hamstrung by a lack of wit and fails, utterly, to see the back door being opened. Then the bully boy noises begin, trying to shout down folk like Sterle and O’Sullivan and Gallacher is a seriously flawed strategy. Grown ups, like them know how to deal with the bullies and liars of this world.
But I digress (easy to do with the volume of data) – the point is that Part 3 provides a very clear example of how a narrow view of one part of a matter becomes the focal point, not the whole. This is reflected in the scripted work for the ‘Great shedding’. When Hansard comes out, I will find some better examples of how the head of ASA is using very narrow reference data to cover a very broad spectrum of increased risk and skating around the many small pieces which, while not dangerous per se, will have a huge impact on the cost, to consumer, who will end up paying for Halfwit’s vision splendid. Unless of course the RRAT committee get sick to death of battering down the departmentally manufactured defence system and pull an inquiry on. It’s a racing certainty that a full, warts, hair and all investigation of ASA is needed; will it happen? Who knows, but I will, after Hansard be setting the tote board odds for this race.
Aye well, more ‘vision’ to study; glad I’ve got a new bucket, three solid hours of Purple Daze to sit through - ………
Edit – ANAO audit Part 3 – go to 06:40 then watch O’Sullivan at 07:06 – the short head shake – he has taken the measure of Halfwit. Priceless demonstration of a picture being worth a thousand words.
The Airservices recording – Part 3 – from the four second mark; provides a good example of the story line Halfwit is trying so desperately to maintain. He wants to keep the narrative restricted to the narrow ‘terms of reference’ the ANAO were restrained by. The Senators are armed with additional knowledge and they let him know that; on several occasions, yet blindly Halfwit follows the script, as writ. Once Sterle gets into the nitty-gritty Halfwit is up on his hinds legs, barking at the front gate, chained to a lack of imagination, hamstrung by a lack of wit and fails, utterly, to see the back door being opened. Then the bully boy noises begin, trying to shout down folk like Sterle and O’Sullivan and Gallacher is a seriously flawed strategy. Grown ups, like them know how to deal with the bullies and liars of this world.
But I digress (easy to do with the volume of data) – the point is that Part 3 provides a very clear example of how a narrow view of one part of a matter becomes the focal point, not the whole. This is reflected in the scripted work for the ‘Great shedding’. When Hansard comes out, I will find some better examples of how the head of ASA is using very narrow reference data to cover a very broad spectrum of increased risk and skating around the many small pieces which, while not dangerous per se, will have a huge impact on the cost, to consumer, who will end up paying for Halfwit’s vision splendid. Unless of course the RRAT committee get sick to death of battering down the departmentally manufactured defence system and pull an inquiry on. It’s a racing certainty that a full, warts, hair and all investigation of ASA is needed; will it happen? Who knows, but I will, after Hansard be setting the tote board odds for this race.
Aye well, more ‘vision’ to study; glad I’ve got a new bucket, three solid hours of Purple Daze to sit through - ………
Edit – ANAO audit Part 3 – go to 06:40 then watch O’Sullivan at 07:06 – the short head shake – he has taken the measure of Halfwit. Priceless demonstration of a picture being worth a thousand words.