[P7_TOM]

‘Nut’ , G'day.  Always nice to have you with us, here on Pru.   Brophy puts up as good, as solid a hypothesis as any other. Bloody sight  better than most, supported by a logic which can, (at very least) be grasped (if not totally understood) by the more ‘practical’, analytical minds here.

IF (big if) the whole truth; and, nothing but the truth from the radar plots and actual's was ever ‘published’; well, maybe, perhaps, we could all  figure it out, for certain.   - Someone, somewhere knows.  The answers are  to be found (a) on the ground (popular favorite); or (b) from the collective (entire) radar trace analysis.  There is precious little else remaining; is there?

Anything else, without an air-frame, debris or a clear ‘sighting’ just feeds the hysterical, foolish, media to repeat anyone’s story .  IF (big if )  we were allowed the services of a real, independent  investigative reporter, un-shackled; this incident would have been sorted out, long ago.  

Alas.  Here we sit; still waiting; waiting for anything that would cause a serious accident investigator to stay awake at night.  From Day One, we have had Bupkiss to work with. In summary; we have nada, ziltch, zero, nutin; `ceptin guesstimation, spin, promises and miles of regurgitated press spin.  

Facts man, ain’t got none.   We have enjoyable, speculative theory by the ducking mile. BUT no facts.   We need ‘em.

Until then; ET rules – OK.