02-04-2016, 06:12 AM
Poor BB, a nice young lad coming under scrutiny by the Deputy spin doctor. It's quite a privilege actually!
Miniscule Truss;
"Mr Bailey recommends engaging the US National Transportation Safety Board. In fact, it has been part of the Search Strategy Working Group since May 2014..."
Oh Mr Truss, you of all people should understand the meaning of the word 'intent'. After all, many of your portfolio's aviation rules and the wording in the 'Act' are written in a manner that allows the author to apply whatever angle he wishes to choose, and as a bonus to always be correct, even when challenged in a correct and reasonable manner and even when provided with overwhelming evidence!
As Sunfish would say; 'to put that another way', I would propose that what Mr Bailey is actually proposing is that Australia "hand over the entire investigation to an investigative body that is known to be of a vey high standard and capability, an organisation that can competently carry out it's function under strong managerial leadership who don't bow down to political pressure and ineptitude, an organisation that can accomplish it's task transparently and within a reasonable timeframe. An authority that is trustworthy, reputable and compliant with ICAO". And of course that organisation would not be the ATSB, which has managed to decimate it's fine global reputation under the leadership of Supreme Leader Beaker.
As you know Miniscule, it's just 'words', that don't really have any meaning and can be applied in whatever manner the author wishes. You yourself should be well acquainted with that methodology sir.
I wonder what 'Mick' thinks about all of this?
"Safe letter writing for all"
Miniscule Truss;
"Mr Bailey recommends engaging the US National Transportation Safety Board. In fact, it has been part of the Search Strategy Working Group since May 2014..."
Oh Mr Truss, you of all people should understand the meaning of the word 'intent'. After all, many of your portfolio's aviation rules and the wording in the 'Act' are written in a manner that allows the author to apply whatever angle he wishes to choose, and as a bonus to always be correct, even when challenged in a correct and reasonable manner and even when provided with overwhelming evidence!
As Sunfish would say; 'to put that another way', I would propose that what Mr Bailey is actually proposing is that Australia "hand over the entire investigation to an investigative body that is known to be of a vey high standard and capability, an organisation that can competently carry out it's function under strong managerial leadership who don't bow down to political pressure and ineptitude, an organisation that can accomplish it's task transparently and within a reasonable timeframe. An authority that is trustworthy, reputable and compliant with ICAO". And of course that organisation would not be the ATSB, which has managed to decimate it's fine global reputation under the leadership of Supreme Leader Beaker.
As you know Miniscule, it's just 'words', that don't really have any meaning and can be applied in whatever manner the author wishes. You yourself should be well acquainted with that methodology sir.
I wonder what 'Mick' thinks about all of this?
"Safe letter writing for all"