[ventus45]

The Malaysians "secured" these two bits of debris - for a few days.
They held them "only" to themselves - for a "reason".
That "reason" was not simply to "consolidate the shipment of the two together".
That is bullshit.  
There was another reason.  
What was that reason ?
We may only speculate.
The fact that Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai is continuously repeating the "line" that:-
“This is in order to adhere to full transparency and accountability in accordance with international protocols, whereby both pieces of debris will only be examined in Canberra once it is in the presence of these experts.”
is:-
(a) clearly typical "ON MESSAGE" - spin doctoring 101 Alpha - for the gluttonous consumption of gullible "nerdie" media dummies,
(b) is clearly not credible, and
© is clearly yet another "deception".

The ATSB's examination of these items will produce one of two expected answers - eventually. The odds on the two are 80:20.
The 80:- they "are" from MH-370 (proof of crash in SIO).
The 20:- they "might be" from MH-370, but "not sure" (implied proof of crash in SIO).
After all, the ATSB can not say anything that might not support a crash in SIO, now could they ?  It would make them look pretty stupid re the "search" now wouldn't it.


I think it ia about bloody time that mainstream media "woke up", though I doubt that  they ever will, or even want to.  
Proof of that ?  
Media People Need To Answer This.

Why have you, the mainstream media, never had either the brains, or the guts, (or both)  to demand a factual answer to a single - pivotal - issue - the radar ?  

Any so called "investigative journalist" can search the web and find out quite a lot about radar, even great detail about the radar cross-sections (RCS) OF EVERYTHING FROM AIRLINERS TO BOMBERS TO FIGHTERS TO THE STEALTH AIRCRAFT THEMSELVES.

Journalists, ask yourselves the obvious question.
How can ALL these state of the art - civilian and military primary radars, located in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia, ALL "fail to detect, see and track, a 30 squater metre radar energy reflecting mirror in the sky, at clear altitude, and clearly "in range" ?

Answer that, with "definitive proof".

And while you are at it, don't fall for the "flying at low altitude - nap of the earth evasion tactics" bullshit from "the authorities" either.  The time to fly the "official radar indicated route" is IMPOSSIBLE for a B-777 at low altitudes.

There must be another answer.
If you truly are "ivestigate journalists", prove it.

Victor Iannello, and others, gave you "the clues".



Pick them up, and "run with them".

The journalist's credo used to be "The public has a right to know".
Is that still the case ?
Or has that been replaced by:-
"The public has a need to be "entertained" - any bullshit will do".

In short media people - get off your stupid arses, and "Do your bloody job".
Find the answer.