[Peetwo]

Certainly been a bit quiet on here of late, I guess we have been somewhat distracted by the shenanigans at Fort Fumble and the pizzling that ASA has been copping at the hands of News Corp etc...etc.

Well to begin to make up for lost time I happened to intercept the following from the SMH today...

$161 million development plans for Bankstown Airport


Date July 29, 2015 - 1:13PM

• 147 reading now
  
• (29)
  
• Read later
  

Leesha McKenny
Urban Affairs Reporter

Bankstown Airport.

A 41-hectare slice of Bankstown Airport would be transformed into a "business park and family leisure destination", under a $161 million proposal that could herald a wave of redevelopment at the site.

With the state government considering new transport links to the area, a company owned by billionaire property investor Bob Ell is teaming up with the airport to put forward a plan for what they are calling the "Bankstown Business Estate". 

The Bankstown Airport site.

The proposal is to redevelop the parcel of non-aviation land on the south-west precinct of the airport for bulky goods retail, a factory outlet and restaurants, along with a business park. It would include more than 3000 car spaces.

Mr Ell's Leda Holdings took over the area in 2013 after the Bankstown Airport Corporation development company, known as BAC Devco, went into receivership before it could complete its own plans for the site.

"Leda views this as an exciting project that will deliver one of the largest employment opportunities for the south-western region of Sydney," said Mr Ell's son Robert, the company's managing director.

The plan's release comes two months after Bankstown and Camden airports were quietly put on the market by the Commonwealth site's main leaseholder, a consortium comprising AustralianSuper, Mirvac and Colonial First State.

About six parties are still in the running for the two sites, which have price expectations of more than $200 million.

"We're in the second round of the EOI at the moment," said Gavin Bishop of Colliers International, who added the sale had no bearing on Leda's plans.

"I think what Leda are doing is going to complement the balance of the airport anyway."
And more development could follow. A new masterplan, approved in January by Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development Warren Truss, earmarks up to 130 hectares of the airport's land for "non-aviation" purposes.

The NSW government, meanwhile, is leaving open the question of what it should do to the area's transport links. Transport for NSW plans to convert the existing Bankstown Line to Bankstown station to a new "metro-style" rail service linking through the city.

But it has never explained what it wants to do to rail stations further west of Bankstown on the Bankstown Line. Transport academic Garry Glazebrook has suggested extending the metro line west directly to Liverpool on a new line through Bankstown Airport. Liverpool Council is also pushing for an extension of the metro.

Transport Minister Andrew Constance on Tuesday suggested plans remain up in the air, saying the new metro line "will be an enabling line which will see further opportunities for expansion ... including potentially to Liverpool onto Badgerys Creek".

Redevelopment of the airport already appears to have won the support of opposition leader Luke Foley, who last month told parliament that it could be a major employment zone "with the right planning, investment and infrastructure".

"It is easy to imagine Bankstown as the next Macquarie Park or Norwest Business Park, full of tens of thousands of high-wage jobs and providing employment opportunities for local people in Sydney's south and west," Mr Foley said.

But the south-west corner of the airport also come to the attention of Senate Estimates, which in February raised questions about fill previously used to build up the site.


Committee chair and Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan told Infrastructure and Regional Development staff that this work had destroyed a natural flood plain and would have a "serious impact" on nearby areas.


"You have a problem, boys," Senate Heffernan said.

The department's written responses state Bankstown Council had raised concerns in the past about the airport's flood management, but the two parties had since worked together, including on a joint flood management study. 

Robert Ell said: "The advice that we have been given by our consultants is that the site is fit for use for its intended purpose".

The council's general manager Matthew Stewart said it welcomed new job generating opportunities but would be making a submission to the plans.

"We would expect any development proposed for this land to be in line with the use and operations of Bankstown Airport; be supported by suitable infrastructure and transport links; and to be consistent with planning controls across our city and the Mid Georges River Flood Risk Management Plan," Mr Stewart said.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/161-million-development-plans-for-bankstown-airport-20150729-gim00r.html#ixzz3hGTnktUK

 
Perhaps Thorny can fill in some of the gaps, but for mine sadly I believe the writing is on the wall for dear old Bankstown...

Also in the (muted) news on Airports, was the AAT decision to affirm the review of former miniscule Albo's signing off on the Archerfield Airport DRAFT master plan,...

Archerfield Airport Chamber of Commerce Inc and Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development [2015] AATA 489 (8 July 2015)
...what it all means I'll leave to those more qualified to comment...
Finally a couple of weeks ago I intercepted an article - off the other Aunty - which IMO highlights perfectly what airport authorities, aviation agencies and the department sometimes have to contend with in the pursuit of safer skies (& airports)...  

Gold Coast Airport Instrument Landing System opponent vows to fight on as feedback period closes


By Michelle Rafferty and Russell Varley
Posted 13 Jul 2015, 11:50amMon 13 Jul 2015, 11:50am

Community feedback on a proposed landing system for Gold Coast Airport closes today.

The Instrument Landing System (ILS) allows airlines to land in bad weather but there is growing opposition because of changed flight paths.

Sven Puetter from the residents' group Stop the Flight Path said the Federal Government needed to think carefully before making a decision on the project.

"The airport itself has a 99 per cent landing success rate and we need to ask the question as to why do 60,000 people need their living standard impacted to improve the landing success rate by less than 1 per cent?" he said.

"The cost is not worth the benefit and I think that's the question the Government need to find the answer for."

He said he planned to keep lobby the Federal Government because it would have the final say.

"We'll continue to put pressure where we can because it is important that our views are consistently out there in front of the public so they can stay across the issue," he said.

Gold Coast Airport chief operating officer David Collins said he was grateful the community had listened to the argument for the new system.

He said the airport would be given a chance to address community concerns with the Federal Government.

"All of those submissions will find their way to the Minister, the Minister for Infrastructure, and we will also provide responses to the Minister for those submissions."

Mr Collins said federal Transport Minister Warren Truss would have 50 business days to make a decision.

"We will combine the submissions, we will then put forward responses to all of those submissions and that summary with the submissions, all of the submissions that have been provided, will be forwarded to the Minister's office and he will then take regard to the submissions, our responses and he will then form his opinion as to whether he approves the ILS or not," he said.

He said the system would help the local tourism industry.

"We are the only international airport in the country that doesn't have an ILS and that does put us at a disadvantage, particularly from an international perspective," he said.

"When airlines are making decisions on whether or not they would look at a route they bring into the account the number of costs, one of which is the cost of diversions." 

"The airport itself has a 99 per cent landing success rate and we need to ask the question as to why do 60,000 people need their living standard impacted to improve the landing success rate by less than 1 per cent?"

FCOL... ...err no comment??
MTF...