[Peetwo]

Auditing an audit - Part II 

"K" - Well, I thought we’d cured P2’s terrier instincts and digging up the graveyard habits, seems not. Details of the excavation to follow, when we have isolated the RCA which turned up late, unsigned by the ‘author’ – P2 job.

With much time to spare (yawn - ) over the Easter long weekend I decided to start doing some digging on the extraordinary disconnections prevalent within the Bankstown Chronicles of the PelAir 2009 Special Audit Report...

To begin I decided to start with the 4 RCAs supposedly associated with the Ben Cook and Mal Christie 21 December 2009 FRMS Special Audit report (see pages 79 to 87 of audit report).

 Example RCA #321074:

---

 

---

Notes:
1) For all 4 RCA Chambers signed on behalf of (per) Ben Cook;
2) Chambers issued the RCA on the 8th January 2010. This happens to coincide with the same day that Chambers released the SAR?;
3) However the Chambers counter signature is dated 5/01/2010?;
4) Unlike all other 8 January 2010 issued RCA, the Ben Cook (FRMS) initiated RCA do not appear to have any components as causal factors?;
5) Finally (like all other RCA) none of the supposedly Ben Cook (BC) RCA would appear, on paper at least, to have been properly acquitted?

Example RCA #321074 pg 2:

---

---

Combining this with passing strange disconnection the audit time frame and the apparent world's quickest acquittal of phase 1 and 2 of the Management Action Plan (MAP) (ref pg 7 of SAR):

---

---

 This was how Chambers summarized the significant deficiencies, identified by Cook and Christie, of the CASA approved PelAir FRMS exemption:

---

---

And from page 21 to 24:

---

---

This naturally got me revisiting the BC PelAir FRMS report to check the veracity of the Chambers SAR and whether it reflected the seriousness of the original identified safety deficiencies of the FRMS...

Given the disjointed chronology of the conduct of the special audit(s); the acquittal of P1 & P2 of the MAP (leading to return to service of the Westwind operations in world record time) and; then the 2nd issue of serious RCA which do not appear to have been properly recorded as acquitted; I was first drawn to bullet point 7 of pg 1 of the appendix H titled - "CORE PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION TO BANKSTOWN FIELD OFFICE":

---

       
          

---

Hmm...so I guess Chambers & Co paid a whole lot of attention to that piece of advice from the resident CASA HF manager - WTD?

The next revealing part of this incisive report (which I was drawn to) is under sub-para 2.2:

---

---

  
Hmm...why does bullet point 3 sound so familiar...   (Hint: Please refer to Example RCA #321074 pg 2 pic -  )

All starts to make sense of this bollocks evidentiary McCormick overreaction from the infamous 15 February 2013 Senate Inquiry hearing:

Verdict: Besides the obvious Wodger cut & paste pugmarks, the disassociation/disconnection between the unbiased professional expert analysis of the Ben Cook/Mal Christie PelAir FRMS SAR and that of Wodger's chronologically fragmented tick-a-box SAR is fundamentally obvious. Therefore the verdict IMO is guilty on all counts of duplicity and hypocrisy 'Your Honour' -           


MTF...P2