07-02-2022, 12:54 AM
This Board is all talk and no action just as its predecessors.
Several examples come immediately to mind about the blazing obvious sham concerns of the Board.
It talks interminably about risk and strategy but does absolutely nothing to create reforms where the risk, or lack of risk, demand immediate action. For one, medical reform to a car driver standard. The Board talks about the delays in the CASA make work medical certification process but palms off the whole CASA self induced problem to the ‘Work Plan.’ Work? What a joke, the Work Plan is nothing more than an excuse to continue the salary factory’s exercise to bambozzle the politicians and maintain the money flow.
Mention is made of Angel Flight but no reforms pushed forward in spite of talk about assessing risk. In court it was made clear that CASA has little regard to actual risk in relation to CASA’s unjustified punitive actions against Angel Flight.
In addition if the Board had any sense of real duty it would by now have considered Glen Buckley’s case in light of its stated objective to create policy with regard to risk. Where was the risk evaluation of Glen Buckley’s logical approach to the GA training industry’s dilemma when CASA introduced its new and monumentally unsustainable rules of pointless complexity?
The Board is galavanting about the countryside with pretend concern at our expense.
The Board of CASA should be ashamed of itself for taking from the public purse for no good purpose.
Several examples come immediately to mind about the blazing obvious sham concerns of the Board.
It talks interminably about risk and strategy but does absolutely nothing to create reforms where the risk, or lack of risk, demand immediate action. For one, medical reform to a car driver standard. The Board talks about the delays in the CASA make work medical certification process but palms off the whole CASA self induced problem to the ‘Work Plan.’ Work? What a joke, the Work Plan is nothing more than an excuse to continue the salary factory’s exercise to bambozzle the politicians and maintain the money flow.
Mention is made of Angel Flight but no reforms pushed forward in spite of talk about assessing risk. In court it was made clear that CASA has little regard to actual risk in relation to CASA’s unjustified punitive actions against Angel Flight.
In addition if the Board had any sense of real duty it would by now have considered Glen Buckley’s case in light of its stated objective to create policy with regard to risk. Where was the risk evaluation of Glen Buckley’s logical approach to the GA training industry’s dilemma when CASA introduced its new and monumentally unsustainable rules of pointless complexity?
The Board is galavanting about the countryside with pretend concern at our expense.
The Board of CASA should be ashamed of itself for taking from the public purse for no good purpose.