09-30-2015, 08:23 AM
Thanks for the education "K", top post, need a vent...
Tough to beat...I'll have a go debating the Institutional Mind Of Batty.
Testing Assumption.
Assumption, firstly is the cause of many mistakes I have learned. Whilst doing Bachelors Degree (might not be of Law or Finance) and then working in the Medical Field, assumption was a no-no.
Assumption without Facts and History can lead to no learning as theorising a "hunch", so to speak would be impossible.
"Supporting good policy" to Achieve Performance Objectives through evidence of rationale. Fancy words.
But how can that be truly achieved based on "Testing Assumption"
Test Facts and History.
Assumption should be a dirty dirty word when Governing a Portfolio, or a Country.
History Proves, Assumptions have landed in the vortex of controversy, as it continues today.
Key Points...
Concerned about a "set and forget approach". Concerned, but nil action, except people being Trumped with your fired! (With full benefits, of course, no assumption there).
"Initial design and work" seems stagnant.
Perhaps because data that is to be evaluated comes from minds who haven't experienced life and observation from outside institutions since the schoolyard. So it continues at that level of thinking. Schoolyard games which Govern the DPMs underlying performance and scripts.
Evaluation of External Parties...
Evaluation from external Parties is of no REAL Value, in the Singular Mind Approach of Assumption. A clear statement of spoken Fact.
Evaluation, interpretation, reasoning, examining or assessing.
How can this be achieved when only assumptions are being tested from those within.
FACTS, history AND external Audits with New Eyes to take stock of findings then report Independently is necessary, in my humble opinion.
Sure have not seen any evidence of that over the past six years as the Aviation Portfolio has bounced it's way around the corridors, almost flying into safe hands of Senators. Almost. Then Assumption is "tabled" and the Led Ball lands on the desk of stagnation wrapped up with a daisy-chain. Looks good, but stinks of stagnant, stinking thinking of "Thy Untouchables".
What foolishness lingers with boundaries established long ago for assumption to impede progression.
Bring in the Outsiders to look upon the facts and history of Cyclic Systemic Disease.
Stand aside the "Voice of Choice" MrDak. Let others make an assumption of your performance, especially with the Aviation Portfolio.
Assumption and Aviation.
Does not sound safe nor fair.
Time for an Independent Outside Audit for the DPMs Aviation Portfolio.
Starting with the scribes of laws that protect not the people, but corporations that Govern our Country, playing Monopoly.
Clever with his words.
Disgraceful with his actions. Fact. History has Proven this.
Get Real DP.
No more blah blah blah.
Your Aviation Portfolio needs a Royal Commission.
Evidence shows this.
Yet Assumption Rules.
How twisted!
Ziggy
Tough to beat...I'll have a go debating the Institutional Mind Of Batty.
Testing Assumption.
Assumption, firstly is the cause of many mistakes I have learned. Whilst doing Bachelors Degree (might not be of Law or Finance) and then working in the Medical Field, assumption was a no-no.
Assumption without Facts and History can lead to no learning as theorising a "hunch", so to speak would be impossible.
"Supporting good policy" to Achieve Performance Objectives through evidence of rationale. Fancy words.
But how can that be truly achieved based on "Testing Assumption"
Test Facts and History.
Assumption should be a dirty dirty word when Governing a Portfolio, or a Country.
History Proves, Assumptions have landed in the vortex of controversy, as it continues today.
Key Points...
Concerned about a "set and forget approach". Concerned, but nil action, except people being Trumped with your fired! (With full benefits, of course, no assumption there).
"Initial design and work" seems stagnant.
Perhaps because data that is to be evaluated comes from minds who haven't experienced life and observation from outside institutions since the schoolyard. So it continues at that level of thinking. Schoolyard games which Govern the DPMs underlying performance and scripts.
Evaluation of External Parties...
Evaluation from external Parties is of no REAL Value, in the Singular Mind Approach of Assumption. A clear statement of spoken Fact.
Evaluation, interpretation, reasoning, examining or assessing.
How can this be achieved when only assumptions are being tested from those within.
FACTS, history AND external Audits with New Eyes to take stock of findings then report Independently is necessary, in my humble opinion.
Sure have not seen any evidence of that over the past six years as the Aviation Portfolio has bounced it's way around the corridors, almost flying into safe hands of Senators. Almost. Then Assumption is "tabled" and the Led Ball lands on the desk of stagnation wrapped up with a daisy-chain. Looks good, but stinks of stagnant, stinking thinking of "Thy Untouchables".
What foolishness lingers with boundaries established long ago for assumption to impede progression.
Bring in the Outsiders to look upon the facts and history of Cyclic Systemic Disease.
Stand aside the "Voice of Choice" MrDak. Let others make an assumption of your performance, especially with the Aviation Portfolio.
Assumption and Aviation.
Does not sound safe nor fair.
Time for an Independent Outside Audit for the DPMs Aviation Portfolio.
Starting with the scribes of laws that protect not the people, but corporations that Govern our Country, playing Monopoly.
Clever with his words.
Disgraceful with his actions. Fact. History has Proven this.
Get Real DP.
No more blah blah blah.
Your Aviation Portfolio needs a Royal Commission.
Evidence shows this.
Yet Assumption Rules.
How twisted!
Ziggy