(10-13-2016, 12:03 PM)Peetwo Wrote: Next week's Estimates daily program released:
Quote:Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport (PDF 132KB)
Infrastructure and Regional Development: Monday, 17 October 2016
Agriculture and Water Resources: Tuesday, 18 October 2016
And in an update to the two motions for inquiry into UAVs, off the Dynamic Red here was the outcome:
Quote:Business of the Senate
No. 4—Senator Xenophon—Reference to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee (use of drones in Australia)
Withdrawn
Business of the Senate
No. 5—Senators O’Sullivan, Xenophon, Back, Fawcett, Rice and Sterle—Reference to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee (Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, Unmanned Aerial Systems and associated systems)
Commenced 12:23 PM
Agreed to
Update from RRAT committee inquiry page:
Quote:New Regulatory requirements that impact on the safe use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, Unmanned Aerial Systems and associated systems.
Status: Accepting Submissions
Date Referred: 13 October 2016
Reporting Date: 27 April 2017
Quote:On 13 October 2016, the Senate moved that the following matters be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 27 April 2017.
(a) current and future regulatory requirements that impact on the safe commercial and recreational use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS), Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and associated systems, including consideration of:
(i) Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 101,
(ii) local design and manufacture of RPAS and associated systems,
(iii) importation of RPAS and associated systems,
(iv) state and local government regulation, and
(v) overseas developments, including work by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and overseas aviation regulatory jurisdictions;
(b) the existing industry and likely future social and economic impact of RPAS technology;
© the international regulatory/governance environment for RPAS technology and its comparison to Australian regulation;
(d) current and future options for improving regulatory compliance, public safety and national security through education, professional standards, training, insurance and enforcement;
(e) the relationship between aviation safety and other regulation of RPAS for example, regulation by state and local government agencies on public safety, security and privacy grounds;
(f) the potential recreational and commercial uses of RPAS, including agriculture, mining, infrastructure assessment, search and rescue, fire and policing operations, aerial mapping and scientific research;
(g) insurance requirements of both private and commercial users/operators, including consideration of the suitability of existing data protection, liability and insurance regimes, and whether these are sufficient to meet growing use of RPAS;
(h) the use of current and emerging RPAS and other aviation technologies to enhance aviation safety; and
(i) any other related matters.
MTF...P2